The first thing that the future students of American universities think about is the opportunity to receive a scholarship to study at one of the country's educational institutions. But how to find and get a suitable scholarship, who and when can apply for it?
Every year, the government of the country and various funds allocate a large number of scholarships for students. Most of them are aimed at citizens of the country. But there are also opportunities for foreign students to receive financial assistance for education. An application for a scholarship must be carefully thought out and planned and approached in advance no less responsibly than admission to a university.
Admission to a university or an attempt to find a job involves writing a motivation letter or a scholarship essay. In most cases, a correctly written scholarship essay is 50% of the process of enrollment to the university of your dreams. That is why you should not be frivolous in writing it.
What is the Motivation Letter / Essay for Scholarship Format?
An essay, or "Purpose Statement", should reflect the goals for which the student needs a scholarship, the reasons why he/she applies for it and why he/she deserves it. Perhaps it is the most important and main thing in the entire package of documents, therefore, one should pay special attention to writing an essay and prepare for it in advance, having studied the format, structure and format of this work. An incorrectly written essay or insufficiently well-founded goals for receiving a scholarship can cross out all the other advantages of a student.
A professional scholarship format essay must include the following 7 elements:
- Your name and contact details (best way to contact you);
- The name of the company or university to which you are applying and its address;
- The date;
- Dear Sir / Madam (Directly to the person/ manager/ hiring manager if known);
- The body of the paper;
- Signature (signed with a pen, untyped format).
Note: Motivation letters / Scholarship essays usually range from 500 to 1,000 words. As in the standard 500-word essay, you must divide them into paragraphs as you write so that you can easily read them.
Scholarship Essay Structure
The classic essay is divided into three parts - the introduction, the main part and the conclusion. Pay special attention to the writing of the introduction and conclusion, they will remain in the memory of the admissions committee and will help you make the right first impression. All three parts of a motivational essay should be clearly structured. In order for your letter to be interesting and informative, it may contain answers to the following questions:
- How and why did you become interested in the selected subject or course?
- How can you demonstrate this interest?
- Why did you choose this particular University?
- What career prospects are you considering?
- Have you ever had to overcome difficult situations and obstacles (financial, social, physical) to achieve your goals?
- What skills and personal qualities do you possess?
- What are your achievements and experiences?
- How do you show the strengths of your personality in life?
- What should make a person who reads hundreds of such texts daily remember and single you out?
The Main Problems of Scholarship Essays
The Cornell University Career Service has published a list of typical problems with weak motivation letters:
- Melodramatic or smug statements;
- Blurry, abstract phrases;
- Personal achievements in a form of a list;
- The use of jargon;
- Spelling and grammar errors;
- Complex and long sentences.
Admission Scholarship Essay Examples
As we have already stated, a good scholarship essay for admission to a university must meet several criteria at once, so it is important to pay attention to the competent preparation of this document.
Here are our top 3 essay samples 2019:
Name: Shervine Janay Thompson
Email: [email protected]
School: University of the West Indies, Cavehill, Barbados
Is Technology Our Friend?
With this letter I would like to express my interest in studying Bachelor’s Degree in Technology at the ABC University. I am a proud 90's kid. My childhood was filled with days of drawing track lanes in dirt and racing with my cousins through our grandmother's backyard. We would pretend to be pilots and make planes out of cardboard boxes. Then on Sunday afternoons we would all jump in my mother's white Nissan Sunny to swim at the beach. I had posters all over my bedroom walls, made paper fortune-tellers, and lied under the Bahama sky during a solar eclipse telling ghost stories. But, being a 90s kid meant I saw technology evolve. I saw cell phones and computers transition from brick boxes to screens as flat as windshields. I now laugh at the memory of using a birthday card to find the venue to my friend's party.
According to the Cambridge online dictionary, technology is “new machinery and equipment developed using scientific knowledge or processes”. Based on this definition, technology goes beyond computers and smartphones, but can include various means of transportation, stationary, and something as simple as a pillow. Although technology has played a role in shaping my childhood, I find that it is the simplicity of technology in the 1990s and the years prior that made my younger days far more authentic than that of someone who was born in the late 2000s. Technology has indeed become a social enemy of society rather than a friend. Its continued advancement has robbed people of their right to privacy and turned them into antisocial robots who can no longer think for themselves.
There was a time when having a computer in the home was rare, and only businessmen walked around with cellphones. Today, almost everyone has access to this commodity. People can now pay their bills online, from the privacy of their own homes. But while technology gives us privacy, it also takes it away. Online payment options have placed many people at a huge risk of identity theft. According to the Bastion Center (2019), “100,000 groups in 150 countries and more than 400,000 machines were infected by the WannaCry virus in 2017”. Catfishing has become a growing phenomenon in North America. It is a type of identity theft used to lure others into romantic relationships. People invest all their life savings in these relationships only to find that the person they fell in love with was not what they seemed. Furthermore, many company websites track the actions of their visitors. For instance, when a person is looking at images of their favorite athlete on Instagram they are then sent more information about this athlete moments later. Although photo sharing applications like Facebook and Instagram have made it possible to connect with long-lost friends, many people run the risks of having their photos judged by strangers from all over the world. Having the ability to post and edit someone's photo has become the backbone of cyberbullying. Cyberbullying is the major cause of suicide in teenagers and young adults.
Before video sharing and instant messaging, a person would have to write a letter or make a collect call. People can now communicate with each other from anywhere in the world without any added cost. But despite technology has made communication easier, it has made us antisocial.
Talking about each other's day no longer seems important at family dinners. People would now rather play on their phones than talk with the person right next to them. Others have developed social media anxiety. They obsess over how many notifications they receive that day or who liked their photo. In fact, many of them would admit that checking their phone is the first thing on their morning agenda. Although I talked on the phone for hours with my friends as a child, this is all we did. We never got side tracked by constant notifications. Yes, I use to sit in front of the television lisping the opening to the Fresh Prince of Belaire. But we all went outside when it was over. We did not have Netflix to binge watch prerecorded television shows and movies all day long. Thus, we interacted with neighborhood kids.
Many would argue that technology makes us so smart that anything one wants to know is a fingertip away. But, technology has made us so dependent on it for information that we can no longer think for ourselves. Children no longer get to experience what it is like to have figured out a hard math problem on their own. They can now research their entire assignment on the internet. There are even websites where university students can buy their entire term paper. In fact, over the years, plagiarism has become a huge issue among universities. According to Plagerism.org (2017), 36% of the 63,700 US undergraduates they surveyed had admitted to paraphrasing or copying sentences from internet sources without using footnotes. Furthermore, the advancement of technology has also cost many to lose their jobs. Companies have replaced manpower with more efficient and quicker machinery. While this may increase production rates, it also can decrease the quality of the product. Technology tells us when to get up, when to exercise, when to eat, what to eat, and how we should live our lives. Without technology, most people feel out of place and incompetent.
Technology, through its advancement, has not only taken away our privacy, but made us so antisocial and dependent that surviving without it seems inevitable. Thus, it is more of our enemy rather than a friend. Apart from being a 90s kid, I was also an only child. This meant I was alone most of the time. Maybe, having a phone or video game would have kept me busy. But then again, if I wasn’t alone or had a phone, my imagination would not have had a chance to run while. If I was too busy playing video games, I would not have had the time to imagine stories and bring them to life. Perhaps, if I had a cell phone or computer I would not have found the need to go outside and teach myself how to skate. Or perhaps, I am lucky to be a 90’s kid.
Plagiarism Facts and Stats [Web article]. (2017, June 7). Retrieved from
The Dawn of Safe Internet [Web log post]. (2019, February 12). Retrieved from
Name - Onjula Chatterjee
Country - India
Email - [email protected]
Educational information - Pursuing Graduation, UG (2nd year BA-LLB)
NATURE VS NURTURE - A BATTLE OF FORCES
I am impressed by ABC University's reputation as the "institution of choice" for clinical team excellence. I am dedicated to helping children succeed academically, socially and emotionally, and I am applying for the psychology internship. In this essay I will discuss the topic most interesting to me…
Are we a product of our circumstances or our birth? This interesting question has divided developmental psychologists since long. It appears as though no particular explanation would quench the underlying conflicts of this debate. Psychology is branded as a behavioral science, or in other words, a science which studies humans, their actions and what triggers them. This restricts its scope within the bounds of subjectivity, although it does offer some empirical reliefs.
Needless to say, humans are not dictated by the rules that direct sciences follow. In a largely liberal society, there would still be divisions between the most devoted partisans. Philosophy, a believer in dogmatism, still lacks uniformity in thought in this ancient clash of opinions.
So what is this debacle which addresses a pertinent existential uncertainty? According to the allies of nature, a person inherits all their individual characteristics from hereditary linkages, from one’s physical appearance to their behavioral traits. Others who field in favor of the nurture rationale, project the belief that a person is moulded by their environment be it social, cultural, religious or a multitude of other external considerations. Both sides present almost equally compelling contentions to support their story.
Several philosophers have lent their thoughts on this subject. Jean-Jacques Rousseau and John Locke both believed that people are born as blank slates. According to this thought, the personality of an individual, including the aspects of their disposition and intelligence, are a result of their external environment. This theory is regarded as “tabula rasa”. Behavioral genetic expert, Robert Plomin, through his research has made the observation that genes account for about half of the differences in the human species while the remaining characteristics are the outcome of random experiences, bereft of familial connections. Arguments and examples can be advanced from either side for the object of validation. A person arguing for the section of nature can submit the reasoning that psychiatric disorders are highly heritable which would most likely impact the character of an individual. Also, several studies have noted the similarities in the actions of fraternal twins. The ones in support of the nurture explanation could provide the example of an adopted orphan child, who could potentially develop mannerisms similar to his/her new family. According to John Watson, an American psychologist, he would be able to train a baby chosen at random from a group of infants to be any form of specialist, irrespective of the child’s talents or race.
There exist a few contradictions which shake the foundations of both the theories as well. Within the nature affiliation, critics point to the fact that heterosexual parents could have homosexual offspring or vice-versa whereas in the realm of nurture, a person’s intelligence and other cognitive imprints are mostly guided by genetic factors. These points of incongruity allude to an interesting supposition. Could there be a way through which these biological and social forces of nature and nurture find means to co-exist within the conditions of human behavior? While it may be true to an extent that some attributes arising out of these concerns become a determinant of one’s personality, however one doesn’t impose severe dominance over the other for it to become an inevitability in itself. A person could be conditioned by both of these influences in disproportionate and variable fashions.
Although pop culture can rarely operate as useful pieces of character studies, the example of George RR Martin’s creation, Daenerys Targaryen, could enlighten the participants of this debate. She symbolized the classic Shakespearean tragedy. Her descent into lunacy poses the similar question of nature versus nurture. Was her insanity powered by her family history, where incest was potent and her own father was suffering from a dangerous mental illness? Or was it a consequence of the tragic corruption of unlimited, unchecked and toxically ambitious power she wielded towards the end of her character arc? Maybe it could have been a combination of both, an untapped mental illness which got fueled and aggravated by the owner’s herculean compass of authority. An interaction would therefore serve as a plausible explanation, but would still lack the promise to cultivate a consensus of the two conflicting ideologies. It does, however, offer a convoluted clarity in this age-long dispute over a vital aspect of mankind. Another purpose it serves is to stunt the growth of neo-beliefs such as the autocratic and authoritarian political regimes dictated on the lines of social Darwinism.
A social experiment might afford a coherency but can never be taken as the writing on wall. In that vein, human behavior and the reason for its genesis can never garner universal generalizations. This creates an unavoidable implication for the conclusions, if any, to this ongoing debate. It is one that fosters the inference that in most of the case studies, there is an interplay of the two forces. It is a battle which originates not out of dominance, but from rationality. When nature succeeds, it doesn’t perish the possibility of nurture.
Dear Sir or Madam,
My name is Courtney Kinder ([email protected]). I live in the United States and will be attending Western Governors University, starting this July. I'm choosing to do my essay on whether humans understand each other.
In my opinion, it takes a lot for humans to understand each other. I once took a psychology course where my professor constantly emphasized that communication is always incomplete. It's not enough to hear what someone says or to even understand it. When communicating, humans also have to interpret the meaning behind what is being said. For this reason and many others, I think it's difficult, but possible for humans to understand each other.
Language is probably one of the greatest barriers when it comes to understanding one another. My first language is English. Although I can read Spanish better than I can speak it, if I were having a conversation with someone who was speaking in fluent Spanish, I would have a very hard time understanding them. The same issue applies in the other direction. If a native Japanese speaker, for example, were to visit me here in Hawaii, they may have a hard time understanding me if I'm only speaking English. Fortunately, there are so many outlets for learning a different language, so it's seen as less of a barrier today than it would've been before technology came to our aid. There are real-time translating mobile apps that can make a conversation flow easier. Also, online aids like Youtube and Duolingo have made it easier than ever to learn an additional language. As long as you can hear the tone of the conversation, and can understand the words that the other person is speaking, it should be easier to understand one another.
Delivery is another barrier when it comes to humans understanding each other. With a large amount of communication methods, it can be hard to get your message across as you intended for it to be undertaken. For example, it is very hard to convey your tone of voice online. It's difficult to tell whether you're being serious, whether you will take responses personally, whether you're being sarcastic, etc. Not only this, but much of communication has to do with your body language. We are constantly speaking without using our words. I may be angrily typing a post about something positive like rainbows and unicorns. I could be crying while writing this essay, but I wouldn't want it to be perceived that way. To make matters worse, nonverbal cues and body language can be interpreted differently across different cultures. When it comes to digital communication, we are almost always assuming the tone of the speaker. This can make it very difficult to understand someone. Things like video calls and video blog posts help to ease that strain.
In all, I think it takes patience and understanding for humans to understand each other. There's no barrier that's impossible to work around. If the issue is a language barrier, it is in everyone's best interest to at least learn the most common phrases and words of the other language. If the issue is in the delivery method used, it's in everyone's best interest to have some sort of video accompanying their words, so that there are no assumptions as to how that communication should come across. Humans will understand each other as long as they want to understand each other. Human beings that only want to accept their own ideas and opinions tend to only understand those that think the way they do. In order to truly understand one another, you'd have to be open-minded and welcoming of other ideologies. This, again, takes patience and understanding, but I believe that it's doable.